Here’s a big watch out. Be careful that your reward of a loyal customer isn’t perceived as having little value. For instance, the hotel at the shore compensated me for my trouble by giving me a free weekend (2 nights). I go to this courthouse quite often for work over the last 20 years. We definitely need jurors to feel safe. The courthouse alley next to the park smells of human excrement and they openly use drugs there.
Intimate pictures began appearing on image website 4Chan yesterday after a hacker broke into 101 famous people’s iCloud accounts.Within hours Twitter was awash with hundreds of thousands of tweets about the photographs which are also alleged to include Brits Michelle Keegan, Cara Delevigne, Cat Deeley and Kelly Brook.Other stars include singer Rihanna, Lea Michele, Hillary Duff, Kaley Cuoco, Kim Kardashian, Selena Gomez and Vanessa Hudgens, Kate Bosworth, Victoria Justice, Emily Browning, Candice Swanepoel and Kate Upton.The hacker claimed to have at least 60 photographs of Oscar winner Lawrence some which they posted online in exchange for the online currency bitcoins.In pictures: Jennifer LawrenceThe pictures appeared to be taken at various locations with some appearing to have been shot by the actress while others were snapped by another person.The photographs, seen by our sister paper the Mirror, range from Lawrence, 24, in a bikini and lingerie to the star being fully naked.A spokesman for the American Hustle star, who has been rumoured to be dating Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, later confirmed the images were genuine.He said: “This is a flagrant violation of privacy.The leak led several of the victims to hit out on Twitter including Die Hard star Mary Elizabeth Winstead.She wrote: “To those of you looking at photos I took with my husband years ago in the privacy of our home, hope you feel great about yourselves.”She also expressed sympathy for others, tweeting “Knowing those photos were deleted long ago, I can only imagine the creepy effort that went into this. Feeling for everyone who got hacked.”Some stars denied the images were of them including former child star Victoria Justice.She tweeted: “These so called nudes of me are FAKE people. Let me nip this in the bud right now.
This article argues that standard three tier scrutiny analysis is not the most coherent way to understand the Supreme Court’s civil commitment jurisprudence. Rather than a harm balancing judgment typical of three tier scrutiny, the Court’s civil commitment cases are best understood as forbidden purpose cases, a construct that is familiar in many areas of the Court’s constitutional analysis. But the Court’s civil commitment cases tie the search for punitive purpose to another genre of constitutional analysis, the application of the substantive boundaries on governmental power most commonly associated with the specific grants of federal power.